[1] Arkusha, L.I., Alenin, Y.P., Voloshin, V.K., Gurtieva, L.M., Lukashkina, T.V., Murzanovskaya, A.V, Torbas, O.O., & Shylin, D.V. (2021). Evidence in modern criminal proceedings: Training – method. manual. Odesa: doi: 10.32837/11300.16149.

[2] Bespalko, I.L. (2020). The exercise of proportionality within the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings. Actual Problems of National Jurisprudence, 2, 119-124. doi: 10.15421/392057.

[3] Blikhar, M., Dufeniuk, О., & Blikhar, V. (2020). The philosophy of the European Court of Human Rights: Axiological paradigm. Beytulhikme - An International Journal of Philosophy, 10(2), 355-371. doi: 10.18491/beytulhikme.1559.

[4] Constitution of Ukraine. (1996, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.

[5] Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950, November). Retrieved from https://www. echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/convention_ENG.

[6] Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2012, November). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text.

[7] Dakhova, I.I. (2018). Limitation of the implementation of human rights and freedoms: Constitutional regulation and practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Law forum, 4, 17-25. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1467599.

[8] Decision of the European court of Human rights in the Case No. 173/15 “Liblik and Others v. Estonia”. (2019, May). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-193251.

[9] Decision of the European court of Human rights in the Cases Nos. 30582/04 and 32152/04 “Karpyuk and Others v. Ukraine”. (2015, November). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ukr%23%7b%22itemid%22:%5b%22001-157510%22%5d%7d?i=001-157510.

[10] Doroshenko, E.R. (2023). Constitutional principles of restriction of human and civil rights and freedoms in Ukraine. (PhD thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[11] European Court of Human Rights. (2023a). Guide on article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights Right. Brussels: Council of Europe.

[12] European Court of Human Rights. (2023b). Guide on article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights Right. Brussels: Council of Europe.

[13] Great Ukrainian legal encyclopedia. (2017). Retrieved from https://ev.vue.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Law_full.pdf.

[14] Hloviuk, I.V. (2018). Proportionality and mechanism of criminal procedural regulation: Theory and practice. In Criminal Procedural Code of 2012: Ideology and practice of law enforcement (pp. 12-39). Odesa: Odesa Law Academy.

[15] Kalinovska, M.О. (2021). The peculiarities of criminal procedural proving during application of preventive measures at the stage of pre-trial investigation. (PhD thesis, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine).

[16] Kantsir, V., Kozmuk, N., Soroka, S., Marko, S., Riashko, O., & Kantsir, I. (2021). Procedural participation of banks in covert investigative (search) action “bank accounts monitoring”. Financial and Credit Activities: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(39), 21-28.

[17] Kaplina, O., & Fomin, S. (2020). Proportionality of interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of property during the seizure of property in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 4(8), 246-264. doi: 10.33327/AJEE- 18-3.4-a000038.

[18] Kaplina, O., Tumanyants, A., & Krytska, I. (2023). Standards for ensuring the legality of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of European Court of Human Rights. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 34, 217-236. doi: 10.34625/issn.2183- 2705(34)2023.ic-11.

[19] Law of Ukraine No. 2939-VI “About Access to Public Information”. (2011, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/2939-17#Text.

[20] Loskutov, T.O. (2023). Legal regulation of the principle of proportionality in criminal proceedings under martial law. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 1, 524-529. doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.91.

[21] Mirkovets, V. (2021). Ensuring the right to liberty and security of person in the application of criminal proceedings. (PhD thesis, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[22] Mohyla, V.S. (2021). Investigatorʼs and investigative judgeʼs powers during submission, consideration and disposition of motions to conduct investigative (search) actions. (PhD thesis, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine).

[23] Muzychenko, O.V. (2016). Implementation of constitutional principle of inviolability of property rights under preliminary investigation. (PhD thesis, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, Dnipro, Ukraine).

[24] Muzychenko, Т. (2018). Appeal of decisions of the investigating judge on the lawfulness of limitations of ownership rights of persons in pre-trial investigation. (PhD thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[25] Nastyuk, V., Mikhailov, O., Izbash, E., & Kondratenko, V. (2020). Judicial control over investigative (search) actions that require prior permission. Amazonia Investiga, 9(28), 151-158. doi: 10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.18.

[26] Nazarov, V.V. (2009). Restriction of constitutional rights of the person in criminal procedure. (Doctoral dissertation, Dnipropetrovsʼk State University of Internal Affairs, Dnipropetrovsʼk, Ukraine).

[27] Poberezhnyk, A. (2017). Guarantees of ensuring the rights to liberty and security of person in criminal proceedings. (PhD thesis, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[28] Reminska, Yu. (2023). The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights as an instrument to counter the rule of law backsliding national legal systems (Some doctrinal reflections). Estudios De Deusto, 71(2), 167-88. doi: 10.18543/ed.2931.

[29] Rohalska, V., Bronevytska, O., Boreiko, H., Shapovalova, I., & Serkevych, I. (2021). Taking of biological samples for expertise under the legislation of Ukraine and its conformity with EU standards. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 3(28), 290-300. doi: 10.37635/jnalsu.28(3).2021.290-300.

[30] Romantsova, S., Zinkovskyy, I., Komisarchuk, R., Balatska, O., & Strelbitska, L. (2020). Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the choice of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings: Legal realities and perspectives. Political Issues, 38(67), 443-458. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.382e.34.

[31] Savchyn, M. (2018). Modern trends of constitutionalism in the context of globalization and legal pluralism. Uzhhorod: RIK-U Publishers.

[32] Shapovalova, I., & Rohalska, V. (2020). Application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights by the investigating judge of the local general court during judicial control. Odesa: Helvetica.

[33] Strekalov, А.E. (2010). Restrictions of fundamental rights and freedoms of the person and the citizen as institute of a constitutional law of Ukraine. (PhD, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine).

[34] Tarasyuk, S.M. (2019). Constitutional rights as a tool to protect a person during investigative (search) actions in his home. Law and Society, 5(2), 154-161. doi: 10.32842/2078-3736-2019-5-2-25.

[35] Teremetskyi, V., Tataryn, I., Kovalenko, V., Yakovenko, M., Udovenko, Zh., & Salmanov, O. (2021). Phenomenon of interference with private communication as the category of theory and practice of criminal proceedings. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(1), 1-10.

[36] Tyshchenko, O.I., & Titko, I.A. (2020). Features of application of precautionary measures for persons suffering from mental disorders: National dimension. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 21(1), 147-161. doi: 10.37635/ jnalsu.27(1).2020.147-161.

[37] Voytovych, I.S. (2023). The grounds for conducting of investigative (search) actions in criminal proceedings. (PhD thesis, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine).

[38] Zinkovskyy, I.P. (2019). Investigatorʼs powers in the course of imposition, change, or revoking of measures to ensure criminal proceedings. (PhD thesis, Odesa Law Academy, Odesa, Ukraine).