[1] Bharara, P. (2019). Doing justice: A prosecutorʼs thoughts on crime, punishment, and the rule of law. New York: Knopf.

[2] Boreiko, H.D. (2022). Criminal and legal consequences of restriction of the prosecutorʼs right to appeal sentence on the basis on a plea bargaining. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law, 74, 188-199.

[3] Casey, J.B. (2023). The power of the Prosecutor in America: Abuse, misconduct, accountability and miscarriages of justice. Criminal Legal News. Retrieved from https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2023/mar/15/power-prosecutor-america- abuse-misconduct-unaccountability-and-miscarriages-justice/.

[4] Cox, J., Meaux, L.T., Stanziani, M., Coffey, C.A., & Daquin, J. (2021). Partiality in prosecution? Discretionary prosecutorial decision making and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17-18), 8471-8493. doi: 10.1177/0886260519849689.

[5] Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2001). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14/ed20010405#Text.

[6] Criminal Justice Standard. Prosecution Function. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_ justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/.

[7] Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine (2012, November). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ 4651-17.

[8] Davis, A.J. (2012). Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[9] Decision of the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the Case No. CIV.A. 00-153 “Pellegrino Food Prodacts Co v. City of Warren”. (2000). Retrieved from https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/136/391/2579801/.

[10] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. (405 U.S. 150) “United States v. Giglio”. (1972). Retrieved from https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/405/150/.

[11] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. (427 U.S. 97) “United States v. Agurs”. (1976). Retrieved from https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/427/97/.

[12] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. 490 (373 U.S. 83) “Brady v. Maryland”. (1963). Retrieved from https:// caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/373/83.html.

[13] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. 71-6732 (412 U.S. 17) “Chaffin v. Stynchcombe”. (1973). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/412/17/.

[14] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. 75-491 (473 U.S. 667) “United States v. Bagley”. (1985). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/473/667/.

[15] Decision of the US Supreme Court in the Case No. 93-7927 (514 U.S. 419) “Kyles v. Whitley”. (1995). Retrieved from https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/419/.

[16] European Convention on Human Rights. (1950, October) Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004.

[17] Guivan, P. (2018). Regarding the limits of implementation of discretion in law enforcement. Journal of the International Humanitarian University. Series Law, 36(2), 46-50.

[18] Hlynska, N. (2017). Standards of impartiality of the prosecution in the sense of Article 9 (part 2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) of Ukraine: Value and criteria. Herald of Criminal Justice. 2, 25-32.

[19] Kakhnovets, S. (2021). Discretion of the prosecutor in criminal proceedings. (PhD thesis, Lviv University, Lviv, Ukraine).

[20] Khitro, А.Y., Shekhavtsov, R.M., & Lutsyk, V.V. (Eds.). (2019). Criminal process. Lviv: LDUVS.

[21] Kislitsyna, I. (2018). Then role of the prosecutor in criminal proceedings on the basis of agreement on the recognition of guilty: Questions of theory and practice. (PhD thesis, National University “Odesa Law Academy”, Odesa, Ukraine).

[22] Lapkin A. (2020). Principle of discretionary public prosecution. Visnyk of the National Technical University of Ukraine Journal. Political science. Sociology. Law, 3(47), 91-95. doi: 10.20535/2308-5053.2020.3(47).229488.

[23] Law of Ukraine. No. 1697-VII “On the Prosecutorʼs Office”. (2014, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1697-18#Text/.

[24] Lowell, H. (2023). Trump and lawyer ordered to pay $ 1 m for bringing “frivolous” lawsuit against Hillary Clinton. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/20/trump-and-lawyer-ordered-to-pay-1m-for-bringing-frivolous-lawsuit- against-hillary-clinton.

[25] Malekh, I. (2022). Theoretical and practical aspects of judicial discretion. (PhD thesis, Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, the Scientific Institute of Public Law, Dnipro, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[26] Pikh, Y. (2021). The concepts of truth and their implementation in the criminal proceedings of the Common Law and Continental Law System. Journal of the Lviv University. Series Law, 73, 161-176.

[27] Pizzi, W.T. (1999). Trials without truth. Why our system of criminal trials has become an expensive failure and what we need to do to rebuild it. New York: New York University Press.

[28] Potrebic Piccinato M. (2004). Plea bargaining. The International Cooperation Group – Department of Justice of Canada. Ottawa: The International cooperation group – Department of Justice of Canada.

[29] Sklansky, D.A. (2017). The problems with prosecutors. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 451-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev- criminol-032317-092440.

[30] Skylar, C.R. (2019). When ministers of justice violate rules of professional conduct during plea bargaining: Contractual consequences. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=3408798.

[31] Torbas, O. (2020). Discretion in criminal process of Ukraine: Theoretical justification and implementation practice. Odesa: Legal literature.

[32] Voitenko, A. (2023). Political neutrality as an indicator of professional prosecution. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 13(1), 74-85. doi: 10.56215/naia-chasopis/1.2023.74.